Archive for February, 2011
February 28th, 2011 | 
Author: 
Posted in 
DUI repeat offenders a challenge for authorities
A driver can be cited for DUI by up to 20 different police agencies, plus county sheriff’s offices and the Arizona Department of Public Safety, and end up in more than a dozen different court systems.
Published Feb 27, 2011.
Read more: The Arizona Republic
Top Reasons to Know Your Dui Laws
DUI laws now entail reform which will continue to sweep the nation. In the past it was a few states that took the forefront when it came to arrests and prosecutions. Some instances may have seemed onerous or even is some cases unconstitutional. Yet, despite opposition. Many of these changes in legislation are now law.
Myriad states have been under serious pressure to lower the thresholds for evidentiary prosecution and to raise the bar in regards to ramifications and punishments. Activist groups like SADD and MADD have for many years led the charge for reform and are no longer small groups with a weak cry. In fact, they are well organized and well funded. The type of resources they wield equates to political clout.
It is no secret that politicians whether incumbents or those up for first time election make DUI reform part of their political platform. This is despite opposition by civil rights groups who will argue that many of the changes border on violations of civil rights. Many of the tactics and procedures being used in the majority of the United States by police officers and sheriff departments have been characterized as being Draconian and at minimum onerous.
The opposition has achieved little traction in their efforts to dilute widespread reform as it is has become clearly politically incorrect to appear to condone drunk driving especially when so many states can tout death rates due to alcohol related accidents diminishing at an unprecedented rate. These statistics have been the impetus to quickly attract some of the states that were lagging in DUI reform.
Some states have actually initiated test programs whereby under specific circumstances if a police officer who senses a motorist may be intoxicated to the point they exceed the legal limit (in most states is .08 for Blood Alcohol Content), then the motorist is subject to immediate imprisonment if they do not agree to a field chemical test. The motorist in some scenarios is then taken to the police station whereby a round the clock rotating judge system awaits them. It could be adjudicated that a blood sample be drawn voluntarily or involuntarily.
If the above sounds over the top to you, you are by no means in the minority. Few individuals realize that the majority of states require a series of implied concessions to receive a driver’s license in their state. You have agreed to many of the procedures and potential consequences as a predicate to the issuance of your license.
These laws are sometimes referred to as a violation of the state’s per se laws. In addition, most states are now moving to what is called an actual physical control state. This means any individual, not just the driver, may be prosecuted. The law stipulates that an individual must have exclusive physical power and present ability to operate, move, park or direct whatsoever a motor vehicle.
Types of DUI laws can be complex and confusing. If a person is asleep or simply sitting in a motor vehicle they may be guilty of DUI. It is critical that you research and hire a quality DUI attorney. Do not settle for deals or vague promises of success. The cold truth is that the prosecution is not looking to find you innocent. A skilled and experienced DUI attorney is paramount in order to have a chance for a positive outcome.
Originally published here.
Adam Hefner
